Article

Introducing GRC software: migrating registers and evidence from Excel

A GRC migration starts with fields, responsibilities and data quality. This sequence moves from the existing workbook through a trial run to business acceptance.

T-NEX GmbHFirst version: Updated: Editorial policy
In daily work

Start with one complete process

A manageable register with a clear owner, such as actions arising from audit findings, makes a useful first scope. Include attachments, external links, macros, distribution lists and downstream reports. Spreadsheets are not categorically prohibited. The relevant questions are the risks of their actual use and whether controls, data quality and evidence work reliably.

Overview

Preserve and clean the starting data

Save a readable baseline before changing anything. Give each record a stable identifier. List duplicates, missing owners, conflicting statuses and obsolete document links. The business owner records each cleansing decision. An import must not translate an unknown value into zero or completed.

Overview

Map fields and relationships explicitly

The target model may distinguish findings, actions, owners and evidence. Multiple actions can belong to one finding. That relationship must not disappear into a free-text field during migration. The working example below shows typical mappings.

SourceTargetRuleAcceptance check
Row numberStable action IDCreate an ID and retain source-row referenceUniqueness and traceability
Free-text nameAccountable person/roleUse an approved mappingResolve unknown names separately
Traffic-light colourWorkflow statusDefine its business meaningCheck examples of every status
File linkAssociated evidenceVerify access and versionOpen the file from the target system
Due dateTyped dateResolve formats and missing valuesNo invented fallback deadline
Overview

Reconcile the trial import

Run an initial import in a separate test environment using approved data. Compare record counts by object, relationships, status distributions and deadlines. Trace sample cases from their source to supporting evidence. Test permissions, approvals and exports separately. A matching total cannot establish that every relationship and access right is correct.

Overview

Define cutover and rollback

Before cutover, name the authoritative system, change freeze and treatment of changes made during migration. A temporary parallel comparison needs a clear purpose and end date. Missing evidence, incorrect permissions or unreconciled data are possible rollback criteria. The rollback plan must also account for records created after the initial import.

Overview

Separate acceptance from ongoing ownership

Business acceptance covers data, relationships and the working process. Operations takes responsibility for permissions, backups, recovery and contacts. Archive the original file under the retention policy. Any secondary spreadsheet that remains in use needs a defined purpose, otherwise inconsistent versions will emerge again. A later review checks whether the new system has become the authoritative source.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Can a large workbook be imported unchanged?

A technical import can succeed while producing an unusable business model. Define field meanings, IDs, relationships, statuses and owners first.

When can the original file be retired?

After documented acceptance of the data and workflow, agreed archiving and transfer to operations. Include this date in the cutover plan.

Related options

You may also be interested in these.

Which task would you like to solve next?

Bring a concrete task. Together, we will define what the application needs to do.

Discuss your project