Working across locations

More development capacity for your project.

With the T-NEX team in Kuala Lumpur, you can extend your development team or commission a clearly defined application. Named owners, shared reviews and traceable results connect the locations. We plan the total effort so that capacity, quality and cost work together.

Developing together
GermanyKuala Lumpur
  1. 01Understand the business task
  2. 02Develop software together
  3. 03Review results with your team

Shared reviews · Clear responsibilities

In daily work

Distributed development with defined responsibilities

T-NEX offers distributed software development for defined projects or as an extension of an existing team. Business ownership, development, review and acceptance are assigned explicitly. The collaboration needs to work clearly for both the client and developers.

Work locations, access locations and participating roles are named in the actual proposal. This also applies to international collaboration. A generic team description does not replace clarity about who works on your project and what they are responsible for.

Overview

Make tasks and results jointly reviewable

A clear backlog describes working cases, expected behaviour and acceptance criteria. Early interface designs help resolve differences in terminology and expectations. Agreed review sessions show usable progress and expose open decisions.

Changes need traceable versioning and an agreed review process. The shared repository, access and approval ownership are defined at the start. Results should remain understandable if individual contributors change.

Overview

Limit access and data to what the work requires

Required systems, permissions and data are defined before project access is granted. Test data can support much of the development work. The specific contractual and technical prerequisites for production or personal data access are reviewed separately.

Development, testing and operating environments receive clear ownership. Access and handover documentation should be available to the agreed operator. A project should not depend on one person being the sole holder of essential account and configuration knowledge.

Overview

Compare total effort, not only hourly rates

A development assignment includes more than programming: onboarding, business clarification, reviews, test data, acceptance and handover also require effort. Infrastructure, external services and later maintenance add further costs. These items are considered when scoping the work.

Distributed collaboration works best when tasks can be described clearly and decision-makers remain available. Its economics are assessed for the actual project. A lower individual hourly rate alone does not establish a lower total cost.

Overview

Begin with a defined work package

A defined first work package can test interfaces, communication and quality expectations in practice. It should include a clear outcome, review and complete handover. The findings inform the scope of subsequent work.

Expansion is based on results that are actually usable. This helps determine which tasks should remain with the existing team and where additional development capacity is useful.

FAQ

Questions about the solution

Can the team work in our repository?

The repository, permissions and review process are agreed for the project. The aim is a traceable shared development state and clear approval ownership.

Where will the project work take place?

Intended work locations, access locations and roles are named in the actual proposal. Permitted access to production data is clarified separately.

Is offshore development always cheaper?

No. Total effort, collaboration and subsequent support determine the outcome. Onboarding, coordination and handover belong in the comparison alongside development hours.

Related options

You may also be interested in these.

Which task would you like to solve next?

Bring a concrete task. Together, we will define what the application needs to do.

Discuss working together